Fieldnotes

Fieldnotes

by Brennen Dyer

Fieldnotes are an indispensible tool for my collecting these days. It might sound like more work to be taking notes in the field, but they actually make your life easier and collection better. A simple habit turns into a clear record that helps you remember more details and make labels easier. Initially I was intimidated but now I can't imagine going back. Here's how I use them.

Fieldnotes are just collecting journals but the upsides to using them are huge. With a clear and concise log of location, conditions, and collecting methods I can keep track of what will be my label data, biotic associations, rearing info, and anything else I think is important. Broadly speaking they're where I log all my "collecting events". More on those below.

Notebook

It doesn't have to be fancy. Any notebook will work. I had an overpriced rite in the rain cover left over from something else and found out size B6 notebooks are a perfect fit and a six pack of them was only $10. I carry forceps in there and some lab tape wrapped around a fine tipped marker has come in handy many times for putting field numbers on samples. This lives in my collecting bag with my other field stuff so I never forget it.

Taking notes

I always start an entry with the date, a description of my location, and what I can report about the conditions generally. Whatever I know about the weather, plant community, and geology should go here.


So what are collecting events? They're just a description of how I collected samples, as specifically as I can manage. Sweep netting a certain plant, blacklighting, collecting galls, aerial netting in a field are all collecting events for my purposes. I just write down codes based on my initials with numbers on them. Yours could be HJK0001 and I actually do recommend simply using initials + four digits so small numbers still look like serial numbers. This is also a familiar format for this kind of thing, and it makes sense contextually when seen on labels or in notebooks and databases. Some people use dashes or other symbols but this can cause problems when searching databases or interpreting small labels. Just keep it simple.


The easiest way to get GPS coordinates is to use a smartphone and any of the many free apps. Because all I want is coordinates and elevation I use aptly named My GPS Location on my Android phone. You can even repurpose an old phone as a GPS unit because it doesn't need cell service. You can get coords later if you're careful with Google Earth or some other mapping service but this isn't ideal. I'd prefer not so great coordinates in the field over hoping I'll be able to find the spot on a map later.


So what does this look like in practice? When I collect something, I write the date and location down in the book, uptick my field number, and describe how I collected it, and write that field number on the container or a piece of paper with the insects.


I might make an entry like this:

August 27th, 2024


Went to my usual spot in the Toiyabe NF along

East Fork Walker River. 30km w. Hawthorne

35.12345°, -110.12345° 1500m in Lyon Co. NV.

Low 80s F with light wind. Light rain came

through last week but everything's dry already.

A bit of activity on what's still in bloom.



HJK0001

  • aerial netting around camp




HJK0002

  • Under dead cottonwood bark




HJK0003

  • Off Chrysothamnus 1500-1600PST


See, If I'm collecting pollinators, I should note the time of day in addition to the plant. I don't need to know a gall was collected in the afternoon instead of the morning but knowing a pollinator is nocturnal completely changes how you understand it. With reared samples, leave room for emergence data. Trap types, pheromone brands, weather events, behavior, microhabitat, plant or animal host, anything you can think of can be recorded. Adapt it to your particular needs. If I'm doing a study I define site codes the same way. I can say WRNV01 through 05 are sites for an Oenothera pollinator study or something. The easier it is for me to keep such finely defined collecting events, the more likely I'll do it and the better my records and data will be.


With record keeping laid out like this it's easy to make great specimens because detailed notes make for detailed labels. Besides, making labels from this is so much easier. I can just read the fieldnumber off the pin and get coordinates and stuff out of a notebook instead of trying to read from hastily scribbled and vague labels on specimens.


Here's the catch: I have to make labels ASAP! If I don't get around to it or die these specimens will likely be thrown away. Not necessarily out of laziness but because the data is missing. Ideally my fieldnotes can be read by anyone but they're as unique as my fingerprints and probably where only I can find them. I can't expect someone to tear my place apart looking for the data to a half dozen samples from camping trips.

GPS

This instant precision in my pocket is a recent development but so ubiquitous that no one can possibly excuse not using GPS. Many GIS systems and GPS formats have been used on labels through the years, such as Township and Range, degrees minutes seconds, UTM, all kinds of goofy stuff. Some people prefer UTM because it sounds more precise for referencing by meters. But precision is merely a function of the GPS equipment, not the geographic coordinate system. It's using the same satellites regardless of which setting the GPS app is switched to, after all. Right now, the most universal is plain old decimal degrees. It's intuitive because circles and degrees make sense to me, it's so simple I can even type it into my stupid car's infotainment system, and I can encode precision easily.


Even though a regular phone will only be accurate to a few meters this is more than enough for most of what entomology entails, save for mapping on the scale of discrete ant colonies or something. That's why I just use four or five decimal places, plenty enough to identify where I was but no more precise than my equipment and collecting methods allow. If the exact microhabitat is important enough to locate so precisely, then it should be recorded on the label and in fieldnotes, not encoded in coordinates. Besides, in my experience it's generally understood that coordinates are inherently imprecise because insects move around, equipment and human error creep in, and microhabitats are usually ephemeral: rotting logs rot away, plants die, sand dunes migrate, streams wander. All this combined means I'm going to rely on the coordinates to get me in the right zip code but far more important is the life history of a given target species.

Share by: